Skip to main content
Production sites is a symposium that scrutinises new cultures of architectural knowledge by examining the sites where knowledge is produced. As a discipline, architecture has largely framed knowledge through the idea of building types,... more
Production sites is a symposium that scrutinises new cultures of architectural knowledge by examining the sites where knowledge is produced.  As a discipline, architecture has largely framed knowledge through the idea of building types, formal styles or sites for design action. Yet participatory design modes, digital technologies, and event-based models present alternatives that probe the divisions between real and imaginary sites, experiential and ideatic encounters, aesthetics and technology. Thus Production sites is a response to fundamental transformations in terms of how cultural knowledge and meaning are currently produced.

In contemporary art, theories emerge from a common thematic framework among groups of artists, providing the theoretical tools to analyse contemporary works (Bourriaud). In architecture, Jonathan Hill’s Weather Architecture shifts theory from the realm of abstract reflection to that of practice-based observation by addressing sites (landscape, weather) as co-producers of architecture and culture. In philosophy, Gernot Böhme’s conception of atmosphere proposes the experience of physical sites and spaces as a source of theory, focusing on the user as an active participant, whose conscious presence in space forms an important source of architectural knowledge.  Bernard Cache’s conceptualisation of architectural images expands disciplinary knowledge towards sites of imagination - places of becoming and unlimited potentiality (Earth Moves). In that, he readjusts the interrelations between architecture and the urban, in particular. The ‘sites’ of writing and their relation to ideas, objects or architectural spaces, are investigated in Jane Rendell’s work. At the interface of architecture and public art, Rendell explores the potential of theory as a form of architectural practice, and positions the spatiality of the text as a form of site-writing.

These theorists have opened up the debate about potential alternative sites for architectural knowledge and they have frequently done so by querying the boundaries between architecture and other disciplines; theory and practice; writing and making. They approach architectural knowledge as an evolving practice that is physically situated, and in which the culture of place, the experience of space and the politics of location inform contemporary production of ideas and architecture. These site-focused approaches probe the questions: how can knowledge drawn from the observation or analysis of the particular become relevant to the discipline at large? What are emerging alternative sites, where knowledge is generated or from which it is also drawn? How do these relate to traditional sites and well-established typologies such as the architect’s office, the university, the museum, the exhibition, or the library? How do new scenarios present an adaption or substitution of these frameworks? What are the modes of production that are related to these sites, and the associated tools and methods? And, apart from architects themselves, are there other producers of knowledge relevant to the architectural discipline, such as users, curators, theoreticians, activists or “cross-benchers” (Markus Miessen)?

The thematic matrix is production + sites :
Generation, organisation, presentation, mediation (production)
Domestic/intimate, Institutional/formal, urban/public (sites)

We invite contributions for an edited book on the topic of “production sites” with confirmed contributions from Professor Jonathan Hill, Professor Jane Rendell (Bartlett UCL) and Gernot Böhme (TU Darmstadt). Please submit an 1000 word proposal for a book chapter (7000 words), or a visual essay of project-based work (2500 words), or interviews (2500 words). If accepted, you will be invited to present and discuss your work at two symposia/workshops: either at the Bartlett/UCL on 29-30 July 2015, or at The University of Sydney on 29-30th October 2015. Please indicate your preference for either or both events in your submission.

Please email your abstract for review: productionsites@ucl.ac.uk

Key Dates:
Submission of 1000 word abstract and short bio by: 15 January 2015 
Notification of Acceptance: 1 February 2015 
Draft Chapter presentation at Symposium London: 29-30 July 2015 
Draft Chapter presentation at Symposium Sydney: 29-30th October 2015 
Submission of all finalised chapters: 18 December 2015.

For any enquiries, please contact the organisers:
Sophia Psarra(s.psarra@ucl.ac.uk); Sandra Löschke(sandra.loschke@sydney.com.au)
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
In the light of increasing environmental awareness, timber emerged at the forefront of material investigations in architecture over the past decades. Waste material from the end of the manufacturing process, or recycled material is fused... more
In the light of increasing environmental awareness, timber emerged at the forefront of material investigations in architecture over the past decades. Waste material from the end of the manufacturing process, or recycled material is fused with other materials to produce composites with changed structural, performative and aesthetic properties. Pulped, cast, bundled, 3D-printed, and robotically-stacked, new technologies enabled a radical shift away from traditional tectonics and towards articulations previously associated with other materials such as concrete, masonry and plastics. Together, these experiments give rise to a new techno-aesthetic paradigm that could be described as a form of transmateriality. 

In nineteenth century architectural theory, Gottfried Semper’s Practical Aesthetics already suggested a synthesis between artistic and technological developments brought about by processes of material transfiguration (Stoffwechsel). Today, new visual languages emerge alongside innovative technologies that  permit the realistic study of material changes across structures:  in folded plates, grid-shells and multi-reciprocal frames, structural integrity is achieved through grading, layering and fusing of surfaces. In practice, developments in timber range from Walter Gropius’s and Konrad Wachsmann’s Packaged House, which unsuccessfully attempted to sell the modern dream of technologically advanced living to the masses, to Jürgen Mayer H’s Metropol Parasol whose captivating elastic forms promise the activation of public space.

In order to explore the interplay between aesthetics and technology in timber architecture, we seek submissions that probe the topic of transmateriality from perspectives that redress imbalances and missing links in the debate.  We welcome critical investigations of historic or theoretical content, as well as practice-oriented contributions and case studies exploring the latest technological research in timber. We also invite proposals for workshops.

Submissions:
Please send a 500-word abstract and a short cv to the symposium convenors Sandra Karina Löschke (sandra.loschke@uts.edu.au) and Matthias Ludwig (matthias.ludwig@hs-wismar.de) by 3 June 2013. Abstracts will be double-blind refereed and notifications will be sent out by 17 June, 2013. If accepted, they will be published on the institutional websites.
For up-to-date announcements and details, please see  http://www.ancb.de/sixcms/detail.php?id=9174361.

The symposium is supported by ARUP and the UTS Centre for Contemporary Design Practices.
Download (.pdf)
immaterial materialities: materiality and interactivity in art and architecture Materiality has recently claimed centre stage in architectural discourse and practice, yet its critical meaning is ever receding. Tropes like material... more
immaterial materialities:
materiality and interactivity in art and architecture


Materiality has recently claimed centre stage in architectural discourse and practice, yet its critical meaning is ever receding.  Tropes like material honesty, digital materiality, material responsiveness and dematerialisation mark out an interdisciplinary field where scientific fact and artistic experimentation interact, and where what in fact constitutes materiality and immateriality is constantly re-imagined.

As a reaction to developments in science, materiality came under scrutiny with the emergence of nineteenth century German aesthetics (Vischer, Schmarsow) and the early avant-garde projects (Lissitzky, van Doesburg). Initiating an epistemic shift in art and architecture, these works pointed to the connection between the material properties of objects and spaces and their interaction with the inhabitant through psycho-perceptual effects. These ideas re-emerged transformed in the work of the Neo-avant-garde of the 1960s and 70s.

More recent approaches deploy materials as mediators or activating agents that probe the relationship between audience/user and physical environment: Spatial investigations with phenomena-producing materials such as water, light, colour and temperature experiment with the viewer’s experience (Eliasson); responsive high-tech materials interact with audiences (Spuybroek); weather architectures (Hill), or atmo architectures (Sloterdijk) technologically re-create nature as spatial experience (Diller and Scofidio).

Materials can give rise to seemingly incompatible connotations: photographic representations of Zumthor’s atmospheric concrete spaces reveal unexpected links with the post-industrial spaces of power plants and cooling towers (Ursprung). In the Pacific region, space has eminently temporal aspects and, particularly in indigenous buildings, rare walls are permeable and breathing. At the same time, the popular use of low-cost materials such as corrugated metal connects the wool-shed, the beach house and industrial estates educing trans-historical, cross-cultural, and climatic associations.In architectural practice and education, experiments in material-oriented computational design explore the design potential of conventional construction materials.

All these approaches probe boundaries - between material and immaterial, art and science, practice and theory, representation and experience, tradition and innovation, and producer/object/user, giving rise to the following concerns:

What is the validity of different approaches to materiality in relation to the vital problems of our time?

Can materials be deployed to create environments which predict user behaviour and control social relations and experiences?

What trans-historical correspondences can be detected in contemporary approaches to materiality, and how do these challenge, imitate and expand on previous thinking?

Please send a 500-word abstract and a short cv to Sandra Karina Löschke (sandra.loschke@uts.edu.au) by 25 June 2012. Notifications will be sent out by 23 July, 2012. Double-blind refereed abstracts, if accepted, will be published on the Interstices website (www.interstices.auckland.ac.nz).  Selected contributions will be published. The symposium is followed by a call for papers for the Issue 14 of Interstices: A Journal of Architecture and Related Arts on the same topic. The symposium takes place at the University of Technology Sydney on 28 -30 November 2012. http://interstices.ac.nz/call-for-papers-3/
immaterial materialities: materiality and interactivity in art and architecture Materiality has recently claimed centre stage in architectural discourse and practice, yet its critical meaning is ever receding. Tropes like material... more
immaterial materialities:
materiality and interactivity in art and architecture


Materiality has recently claimed centre stage in architectural discourse and practice, yet its critical meaning is ever receding.  Tropes like material honesty, digital materiality, material responsiveness and dematerialisation mark out an interdisciplinary field where scientific fact and artistic experimentation interact, and where what in fact constitutes materiality and immateriality is constantly re-imagined.

As a reaction to developments in science, materiality came under scrutiny with the emergence of nineteenth century German aesthetics (Vischer, Schmarsow) and the early avant-garde projects (Lissitzky, van Doesburg). Initiating an epistemic shift in art and architecture, these works pointed to the connection between the material properties of objects and spaces and their interaction with the inhabitant through psycho-perceptual effects. These ideas re-emerged transformed in the work of the Neo-avant-garde of the 1960s and 70s.

More recent approaches deploy materials as mediators or activating agents that probe the relationship between audience/user and physical environment: Spatial investigations with phenomena-producing materials such as water, light, colour and temperature experiment with the viewer’s experience (Eliasson); responsive high-tech materials interact with audiences (Spuybroek); weather architectures (Hill), or atmo architectures (Sloterdijk) technologically re-create nature as spatial experience (Diller and Scofidio).

Materials can give rise to seemingly incompatible connotations: photographic representations of Zumthor’s atmospheric concrete spaces reveal unexpected links with the post-industrial spaces of power plants and cooling towers (Ursprung). In the Pacific region, space has eminently temporal aspects and, particularly in indigenous buildings, rare walls are permeable and breathing. At the same time, the popular use of low-cost materials such as corrugated metal connects the wool-shed, the beach house and industrial estates educing trans-historical, cross-cultural, and climatic associations.In architectural practice and education, experiments in material-oriented computational design explore the design potential of conventional construction materials.

All these approaches probe boundaries - between material and immaterial, art and science, practice and theory, representation and experience, tradition and innovation, and producer/object/user, giving rise to the following concerns:

What is the validity of different approaches to materiality in relation to the vital problems of our time?

Can materials be deployed to create environments which predict user behaviour and control social relations and experiences?

What trans-historical correspondences can be detected in contemporary approaches to materiality, and how do these challenge, imitate and expand on previous thinking?

Please send a 500-word abstract and a short cv to Sandra Karina Löschke (sandra.loschke@uts.edu.au) by 25 June 2012. Notifications will be sent out by 23 July, 2012. Double-blind refereed abstracts, if accepted, will be published on the Interstices website (www.interstices.auckland.ac.nz).  Selected contributions will be published. The symposium is followed by a call for papers for the Issue 14 of Interstices: A Journal of Architecture and Related Arts on the same topic. The symposium takes place at the University of Technology Sydney on 28 -30 November 2012. http://interstices.ac.nz/call-for-papers-3/
Download (.pdf)
Download (.pdf)
If there are architectural investigations that centre on the 1930 Werkbund exhibition, they tend to direct our attention to standardized designs of modern buildings and everyday objects that deployed the mass-produced dream materials of... more
If there are architectural investigations that centre on the 1930 Werkbund exhibition, they tend to direct our attention to standardized designs of modern buildings and everyday objects that deployed the mass-produced dream materials of the time: Plastics, steel, glass and aluminium were celebrated as the achievements of an emerging industrial nation. The compelling economy of function and material conjured up a vision of rationalized abundance and unstoppable progress made possible by “the interpenetration of art, industry and technology” (Gropius 1930) that had been advanced by the Werkbund over the past decades.  “From stationary to chair, from cup to furniture covering, from theatre to sports field, and from the newest Hanomag locomotive to the serially-produced car” (Dorner 1930), the exhibition represented outstanding examples of German design as part of a new, all-embracing aesthetic system.

Counter to the survey nature of the exhibition, there is, however, a second conjecture that looks beyond the particularity and material logic of the designs. Instead, it considers materiality at the scale of the exhibition whose energetic atmosphere and transformative effects made it an edifice in its own right. Exhibition material was lined up, stacked, mounted and suspended mid-air, generating patterns and rhythms across walls, ceilings and rooms. Together with dynamic illumination, reflective materials, and colourful neon signs, the arrangement of material aimed at the production of architectural experiences that translated the concepts of modernity as sensory impressions, sending the visitors back into the sphere of urban activity that they had momentarily left behind when entering the exhibition. Reviews describe the quasi-urban scenario and the intense sensory stimulation in vivid detail:  “Dynamics are offered instead of rigidity. Luminous arrows that point towards a new subsection protrude brightly, recede in the dark and push forward again. Theatre models […] rotate, flicker disquietingly through little lights” (Osborne 1930).

The aim of this chapter is to pursue the way in which the Werkbund exhibition signified a shift away from the technical representation of objects through the usual records (drawings, images, models, etc.), and towards the aesthetic translation of the concepts inherent to these objects (dynamism, variation etc.) as material sensations. The five exhibition spaces not only formed chronological and thematic units, but a sequence of discrete sensations and percepts, which were the actual building material of the exhibition – “blocs of sensation” as Delezue and Guattari termed it (1994). The varied staging of display material submitted the viewers to “immersive changes” (Sloterdijk 2011) and increased their awareness of the architectural reality of their environment and themselves as part thereof. Focusing on a detailed analysis of Moholy-Nagy’s design of Salle 2, this chapter argues that, despite receiving little attention at the time, his work constituted a decisive contribution to this development.
At stake for the museum in the early 1920s, Alexander Dorner suggested, was much more than art historical erudition and connoisseurship but the adequate resolution of the only thing that mattered – “ourselves and our vital problems”... more
At stake for the museum in the early 1920s, Alexander Dorner suggested, was much more than art historical erudition and connoisseurship but the adequate resolution of the only thing that mattered – “ourselves and our vital problems” (1958: 147). The purpose of the museum was to aid the improvement of self-awareness and a deeper understanding of the present situation, he insisted, and this could only be accomplished if “the energies that, surging up from the past, have invaded our own lives” (147) were uncovered. It was apparent to him that the museum would have to utilise “all possible sensory and intellectual resources of representation” (146) to achieve this aim.
The particular challenge identified by Dorner appeared to be one of method – how could historical and cultural content be mediated adequately in order to become relevant for the present? Something beyond scientific organisation and repre¬sentation was at issue – something that materialised immaterial energies that lay dormant in our cultural heritage and that, once activated, had the capacity to improve human life and facilitate social progress. It is Dorner’s own curatorial re¬sponse to these challenges that is under investigation in this study, which focuses on Dorner’s reorganisation of the collections at the Provinzialmuseum Hannover between 1923-26..
Dorner’s grouping of period works in discrete Atmosphärenräume (atmosphere rooms) and the introduction of an evolutionary itinerary have been considered conventional and comparable to earlier reorganisation efforts (Flacke 1993: 137; Klonk 2009: 94; Scholl 1995). Similarly, his concurrent deployment of atmospheric immersion and an evolutionary itinerary have been seen as incompatible and a grave inconsistency in his curatorial approach: on one hand, the audience’s iden¬tification with an epoch precludes the possibility of a continuous consciousness – the viewer is expected to empathise; on the other hand, it is precisely the cog¬nition of a historic continuity that is evoked with the realisation of a concept of historic development (Flacke-Knoch 1986/87: 137).
Counter to these arguments, this study suggests that it is possible to attain a more nuanced reading of Dorner’s strategies by pursuing a detailed analysis of elements of his curatorial practice – in particular, central display elements such as the use of wall colour and reframing. When unravelled in relation to his museum guide¬books and other information material, his practice emerges as a calculated staging of intellectual insights and sensory impressions. However subtle, Dorner’s strate¬gies marked a turning point in the presentation of artworks in museums by going beyond issues of representation and taste that governed the work of his peers. His stage-managed environments transformed the way the audience interrelated with the art objects presented to them – a material dialectic intended to promote empathy and immersion whilst simultaneously encouraging active reception and awareness of reality.